Sunday, December 20, 2009
Slow News Week
Friday, December 18, 2009
Why Waste Two Posts?
Thursday, December 17, 2009
What is Tiger's Doctor up to? My (pure) speculation
There seems to be a rash of these centrifuge based "treatments", none of which is proven. Receently tennis player Tamira Paszek got herself into some trouble for one of these "treatments" and there was something similar used in Operacion Puerto.
I suspect that these spinning centrifuge devices are used to indoctrinate the player's human cells with growth hormone and other performance enhancing drugs, then the drugs are degraded or somehow removed from the mix and the cells are then put back in the body. This way, the cells are activated without the performance enhancing drug ever entering the person's body. They could have such a growth hormone treatment and test negative the same day. The cells will do what they were activated to do by signal transduction even though the drug is no longer present. This is, of course, speculative on my part, but I can't think of another reason that an athlete would need a doctor like this to provide PED's when they are all readily available on the internet. The idea is to get the benefits and still test negative. They could look you in the eye and say that they've never actually taken any performance enhancing drug, since it never entered their body.
Monday, December 14, 2009
More Trouble for Tiger and Friends
NEW YORK -- A Canadian doctor who has treated golfer Tiger Woods, swimmer Dara Torres and NFL players is suspected of providing athletes with performance-enhancing drugs, according to a newspaper report.
There is something that I happen to suspect Dara Torres, Tiger Woods and "NFL Players" have in common. It seems like a bit of a coincidence that they are all visiting the same Canadian doctor.
Wickmayer/Malisse weaseling out of suspension
Victory at the European Commission in Brussels and the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights could force WADA to drastically change its rules on when and where athletes can be tested out of competition.
This is a victory for juicers everywhere.
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Pumped for Australia...
My sure-thing prediction: There will be a lot of oddly pumped up players showing up for the Australian Open and Peter Bodo will instead focus on kangaroos and wallabies.
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Looking at the Evidence

Steroid Nation has a post up about the Marion Jones debacle. Jones had her Gold medals stripped. They also couldn't award the runner-up, Katerina Thanou from Greece the Gold Medal, because she had her own scandal 4 years later in Athens, when she was involved with Kostas Kenteris, a male Greek sprinter who won a Gold in 2000, in faking a motorcycle accident in order to avoid a drug test. The reason I bring this up is the picture above. Women simply do not get this kind of muscle naturally. Yet, to my memory, Thanou was not being accused of using steroids prior to the fake motorcycle accident. My point is that there should be no doubt from the visual evidence above that this woman was using steroids. I think that so many athletes are now using performance enhancing drugs that we have lost the sense of what a naturally athletic build looks like. It would appear that the drug test caught her by surprise. She must have believed that she already had beaten the drug tests and could get one last injection in before the race. She apparently had already pulled it off in the previous Olympics. Neither Marion Jones, Katerina Thanou or Kostas Kenteris had ever tested positive for a performance enhancing drug. Unless the drug testing is absolutely ruthless, we will continue to have athletes that anyone with eyes can see are cheats, winning championships that are later tainted.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
More Mysterious Heart Problems
Update: Oops, I misread the story. I understood that he was back in competition. Well, I'd scrub it, but I'll leave it up as a record of me jumping to possibly unfair conclusions and talking too much crap.
Albert Costa of the Spanish Davis Cup team had some heart trouble:
The 34-year-old Costa was admitted to a hospital near Barcelona after complaining of heart palpitations, chest pains and hypertension, the Spanish tennis federation said. He was released hours later and was at home resting.
There sure seem to be a lot of healthy young professional athletes with heart problems. While it's not impossible that some of these are just isolated incidents, it seems likely that some of these heart problems are related to the use of performance enhancing drugs such as EPO, as well as amphetamine derivatives.
Steroids Likely a Cause of Kidney Damage
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Steroids in other Sports
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
WADA Appealing Wickmayer/Malisse bans
"To drop from two to one year there have to be justifiable elements,"Wada legal director Olivier Niggli said.
"We're going to appeal because we still don't have all the elements which will allow us to decide whether a sanction of one year is appropriate,"
It is also interesting that WADA needs to appeal in order to find out the details of the case. Are tennis officials trying to keep WADA at arm's length?
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Another on the Nadal Is Losing Weight Bandwagon
Now for a guy who doesn't lift weights to any significant extent, how does he lose 15 lbs? He doesn't seem more cut, so it doesn't seem that he is cutting fat, so unless he has a chronic medical disorder, it seems strange that he would just lose 15 lbs of muscle. (thanks anonymous via the website that shall not be named).
Monday, November 30, 2009
Indian Tennis Pro Discusses Drug Cheating
Indian tennis pro Mahesh Bhupathi has given a whole new dimension to the ongoing debate surrounding anti-doping rules in the game. The experienced Indian has squarely blamed tennis players for compelling the authorities to adopt new stringent dope rules. Bhupathi pointed out that tennis players from all over the world have brought it upon themselves by repeatedly cheating.
“The tennis players themselves have brought it (anti-doping rules) upon themselves. A lot of players have been cheating. The players have to cooperate to weed out instances of cheating from sports,” Bhupathi told reporters here today.
Clearly, players who are not cheating and are angry about losing to juicers need to get together on this issue. If it becomes obvious that the beefed up players are against the drug testing rules and the less juiced players are in favor, it will highlight the problem. Unfortunately, since many of the top players are likely juicing and they are the ones most likely to be listened to on this subject, we have a bit of conundrum.
Serena fined $82,500 for possible 'roid rage episode

If this was a case of 'roid rage, I'm not sure an $82,500 fine from a tournament in which she won over $350,000 is going to serve as much of a deterrent.
Saturday, November 28, 2009
A Player Comments on an experience with PED's
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Why Tennis Officials Might Be Inclined to Look the Other Way
U.S. Tennis Association tax forms show that former CEO of professional tennis Arlen Kantarian received more than $9 million in total compensation in 2008, his last year running the U.S. Open.
According to documents obtained Monday by The Associated Press, Kantarian was paid about $1.6 million in base compensation, about $2.3 million in bonus and incentive compensation and nearly $5.2 million in other reportable compensation that year.
I have to admit that, for 9 million, I'd personally inject these players myself.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Wilander on Nadal
He's not playing any different to the way he used to, but he might not be quite as strong. He's lost some weight because of his knees maybe.
How is a tennis player going to lose weight by playing less tennis? When you lay off a cardiovascular sport like tennis, you are likely to gain weight. (Thanks for the link, Anonymous)
Udate with Pic:

I have actually been slow to embrace the "Nadal is getting smaller" meme, but I think this pic shows a smaller Nadal. He still has decent bicep definition, but his size is down. He never had much of a chest, but it looks even smaller. It is hard to tell with his new sleeved look, but I think it is hard to argue against the conclusion that he is smaller. Given that, and the recent Agassi revelation, I am giving more credence to the rumor that he got into some kind of drug testing trouble and has had to lay off the supplements. You have a player who has been complaining about drug testing, who mysteriously dropped out of a very important tournament, who is getting smaller for no apparent reason and who is losing more matches. Is there another conclusion?
Here's Baba's Retort (for those following the comments):

I'll say that his left bicep is still hanging in there, but I'm otherwise unimpressed. His right arm was always smaller, but looks downright wasted away in these recent pics, his shoulders seem like a regular guy's (I admit it's harder to tell with his current sleeved shirt style). Anyone else, feel free to chime in.
Evolution
From the "Could this be 'roid rage?" collection
By the way, if anyone can find a clip of Wickmayer's episode in Clearwater earlier this year, I'd appreciate it.
Update: "Baba" links to an interesting incident with Malisse and makes a few other points in the comments.
Friday, November 20, 2009
ATP: Agassi Free and Clear
They also excuse themselves from keeping his positive test a secret:
"If we had revealed that test it would have been in contravention of the rules at the time," he said.
Now, is this true? There were players who tested positive both before and after Agassi and had their tests made public. Was there a brief change in the rules just for Andre or is this "contravention of the rules" bunk?
Monday, November 16, 2009
Another Soccer Player Dies
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Wickmayer Challenges Whereabouts Rule
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Wickmayer Playing for Sympathy
So, to counter that, I will point out that she missed not one but 3 whereabouts tests, has altered her story, appears pumped up, has quickly moved up to number 16 in the world and one might wonder whether she had an episode of 'roid rage this year.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Safin Says Agassi Should Give His Titles Back (and His Money)
"I'm not defending the ATP, but what he said put it in a delicate position," Safin said. "The ATP allowed him to win a lot of tournaments, a lot of money. It kept his secret. Why does he need to be so cruel with it?"
I notice he wasn't asked the obvious question and I'm wondering if we have a case of the pot calling the kettle black?
Update: I'm adding a pic of Safin for reference. There are certainly differing opinions regarding suspicion of PED use for him, but I would disagree with the commenter who describes him as "scrawny."
Monday, November 9, 2009
Doping Favoritism for the Stars
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Gasquet not out of the woods...
Richard Gasquet will go before the highest court in sports Tuesday for what he says was a cocaine-tainted kiss in a nightclub.
The World Anti-Doping Agency and International Tennis Federation have asked the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Switzerland to ban him for one to two years.
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Late with the big news in tennis doping
To Bodo's credit, he finishes his piece like this:
My immediate reaction -- that this is a case of overkill -- has been changing even as I've typed these words. I'm going to suspend judgment until the appeals are formally submitted, but it would be terribly unfair to all those players over whom Wickmayer has leapfrogged if her apparently conscious effort to avoid those tests represented something more than youthful irresponsibility.
What should be quite obvious is that Wickmayer has been playing some stellar tennis of late and looks a little pumped up. She missed 3 drug tests. To say that it isn't a real doping violation because she didn't test positive is to not understand the nature of doping. She likely missed these tests for the obvious reason that she was worried as to what the result of the tests would be. This is a common strategy, as has been pointed out on this website in the past. If players know when they will be tested, they are going to test negative, unless they are stupid or very careless. If you are going to catch players doping, you have to have tests for which they are given no advanced notice. While it's true that tennis players travel more than some athletes, most other professional sports involve traveling around the world during the season. There is simply no reason that a player couldn't tell a doping official his or her location. I'm sure they tell their husband or wife where they are (and I doubt the spouse would accept an "I forgot my password" excuse). There are millions of dollars on the line for these players. All the more reason that they need to be clean and available to prove it on a moment's notice.
It may be that this increased punishment for Wickmayer and Malisse came about because of the Agassi revelation. Nevertheless, maybe that is what what was needed to start taking doping in tennis seriously.
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
WADA wants some answers from The ATP
"The ATP can confirm it has received a letter from WADA," the tour said in a statement e-mailed to the AP on Monday. "When it responds it will do so directly to WADA and not through the media."
The statement continued, in part: "The ATP would also like to reiterate its policy of not commenting on anti-doping test results unless and until an anti-doping violation has been found."
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Agassi Story Not Yet Dead
Friday, October 30, 2009
Martina talks trash
"Shocking," Navratilova said Thursday from Sarasota, Fla., in a phone interview. "Not as much shock that he did it as shock he lied about it and didn't own up to it. He's up there with Roger Clemens, as far as I'm concerned. He owned up to it [in the book], but it doesn't help now."
Now, in light of the comment in the post below from a top tennis official that the WTA was doing virtually no drug testing at the time she was playing and the fact that she had, shall we say, a rather powerful physique, that is rich.
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Former Official Vindicated
Mendoza was widely condemned by tennis authorities for daring to speak out about his concerns. He warned in 2002 that tennis officials were living in a "fool's paradise" if they did not recognise a major problem in their sport. "Tennis is heavily under the influence of doping and they are in denial if they don't accept that," he said. In response, International Tennis Federation executive director Debbie Jevans accused Mendoza of making "broad-brush statements without any evidence".
Mendoza was not at all surprised yesterday to hear of Agassi's admission. "I didn't say it (in 2002) just because I felt like a bit of notoriety. I said it because there was so much evidence from within the sport that things were right off the rails. "I had been hearing from 1997 that they (ITF and ATP) were burying results, and the WTA wasn't testing at all." He said there was rampant speculation at the time that Agassi was using drugs."Agassi was viewed by his peers as a user," Mendoza said.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Maybe this story will have some legs
By the way - Where's Peter "I've seen nothing to refute the claim that tennis is by and large clean, and well-policed..." Bodo on this subject? Is he going to do another puff piece instead? Once again, I'm calling you out, Bodo!
And in case there are any journalists out there with some guts, it's time to take another look at the death of Mathieu Montcourt.
I'm loading up this post, as I only get one chance if a journalist happens to peak at this site and I want good info right up top - so let me remind them that in 1998 (oops, that's 2003), there were at least 7 and possibly as many as 42 players that tested positive for steroids and were never named, dubiously blaming the tests on "tainted supplements." Also, anyone notice the dearth of Americans sanctioned for performance enhancing drugs? Given the recent revelations from Agassi, one might wonder whether there is a bit of pro-American bias.
Here's Agassi in 2003:(thanks anonymous)
"The one thing that I'd like to stick to is what we do know," said Agassi after his victory over South Korean Lee Hyung-Taik.
"What we know is, while there's been a minimal amount of players caught over the last 10 years, we are probably the leading sport in reference to how often we test, how professional our tests are and how strict our penalties are.
"The talk of who might be or might not be taking drugs is irresponsible,"
Is the facade beginning to crack?
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Agassi in his own words not too long ago...
Drugs and booze: “When it comes to drug testing, I’ll hold tennis up to any sport in the world.”
“I find myself focusing the most on what our sport is doing to make sure that if you’re cheating, you’ll get caught. And that’s where I take refuge. I believe our sport is on the leading edge, pioneering ways to hold players accountable.
Even when I was playing, I was drug tested one year something like 20 times, and I didn’t play as much as many others. If you cheat, it’s not a matter of if you get caught, but when you get caught.” As far as gambling is concerned, he said, “In my years playing, I never saw it or heard of it. And I would hate to see the actions of a few tarnish the sport. I support a zero-tolerance policy on this issue.”
Agassi reportedly used Crystal Meth during his playing years
Monday, October 26, 2009
Federer Discussing Doping?
Thanks,
THASP
Update: Oops, looks like someone already briefly summarized it in the comments. I'll post that. Thanks again:
The article above says that Federer wants the ITF to save doping tests for up to 8 years.
Söderling does not agree: "It's one thing if the player is still active, but 8 years is a long time and I don't know what why you'd want to expose a player who has already retired. You can't punish the player and it wouldn't help the opponents he beat so I don't see the point."
It also brings up Murray's and Nadal's whining about the whereabouts. WADA's David Howman replies: "It's mostly tennis players criticising the WADA code. It seems as though they haven't quite understood it. Murray complained about the antidoping officials knocking on his door before 8 in the morning, but he himself had picked 7-8 as the time he'd be available for drug testing".
In my opinion, there really is no good reason to oppose this idea from Federer, unless you are afraid that your current performance enhancing drug use, which is beating drug tests, will be detected sometime in the next 8 years when better testing is available. It might even discourage players from some types of doping (maybe I'm being naive).
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Wickmayer weasels out of suspension
The 20-year-old Wickmayer has said she had trouble with her password in the computerized system overseen by the World Anti-Doping Agency. She also said registered mail at her home could not be signed off on since she was traveling to WTA tournaments.
She insisted she never missed an anti-doping test and her samples were always negative.
Right, and her dog ate her homework.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Soderling "Warned" for Missing Doping Test

As yet, I only have this Swedish language link for this story (Thanks Anonymous). I am told that it says that Soderling was "warned" for missing a doping test at the French Open. Apparently he switched hotels and "forgot" to tell testers. Let me make a couple of points about this:
1. Soderling did pretty darn well at the French, as I recall.
2. I think that there are going to be a lot more of these "innocent oversights" by players when they "forget" to tell drug testers their whereabouts. This is a common strategy that I have touched on here before in the post related to Victor Conte.
3. It appears that drug testers are getting more aggressive. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
4. The French Open was awhile ago, so it makes me wonder how many other athletes have had similar situations with similar "warnings". This is consistent with rumors about a popular player from Spain, so it will be interesting to see if that rumor (which I still doubt) pans out.
If anyone has an English version of this story, please send me the link or put it in the comments section.
Update: It appears that he is being given a "strike". You are allowed 3 in 18 months. To my knowledge, this and Wickmayer's are the first public notifications of someone getting a strike from the whereabouts rule. An English version of the story can be seen here (thanks Rikyu).
Here's Soderling's story and he's sticking to it:
“I had said I would stay at the Hilton but changed hotels and forgot to announce it,” Soderling said at this week’s If Stockholm Open. “I realized after a few days but it was too late because the doping inspectors had already searched for me for a test.”
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Wickmayer rolls on without a care in the world

Wickmayer is in the finals, even though she faces a doping tribunal in less than a week. Why is she even allowed to play? Does she know something we don't?
Friday, October 16, 2009
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Ivo Minar tests positive for a PED

Czech tennis player Ivo Minar was banned for eight months on Wednesday after testing positive for a banned substance following a Davis Cup match.
A sample taken after the Davis Cup quarterfinal against Argentina on July 11 contained the banned stimulant methylhexanamine, the International Tennis Federation said.
And, like all athletes who test positive for performance enhancing drugs, he tries to blame it on a supplement. Methylhexanamine is basically a speed. It was also recently implicated in a doping scandal involving several Jamaican track athletes this year.
Let me also note that this is my 300th post on this blog...
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Another Death In Cycling
Some Players Want Shorter Season
Update: Nadal seen here complaining about the long season:
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Not too pumped
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Less Pumped?

She still has decent muscle tone, but it appears that Dinara is decidedly less pumped. Perhaps she has been using less of the "supplements" of late, which could explain her recent lack of success.
Update: An interesting non-sequitur regarding the history of EPO was put in the comments of this post (Thanks again, Anonymous).
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Just So It's Not Forgotten
I still think it might be possible to get to the truth of this. Is there no sports journalist out there who deems this story worth investigating?
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Wickmayer to face doping tribunal

Apparently, Yanina Wickmayer blew off the Whereabouts rule three times in the past 18 months. Perhaps drug testers are doing their job. I hope they will do the same if some of the bigger name players do the same. For the record, I would put her in definite "Phase 1" territory. (Thanks again, anonymous)
Update: Male player Xavier Malisse is also in the same boat. Interesting that it's two Belgian players at the same time. (thanks, Rikyu).
Update 2: I should point out, in fairness, that Malisse doesn't look particularly pumped.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
For Not So Old Time's Sake
Monday, September 28, 2009
Federer on Doping
Doping even attacks tennis?
I’d like a sport without doping, but it’s an illusion. There’s so much money involved, this pushes people to take drugs. I am convinced that doping doesn’t help tennis. Only a minority think differently. We can be submitted to checks at any moment and I believe that it’s the right thing to do. I prefer to know that I am playing against a clean opponent. Unfortunately it’s not always so.
Update: Here is a link to the interview on YouTube (which was apparently for Italian television, but was done in English). The Doping stuff starts at about the 8:40 mark.
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Still Strong
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Other benefits of such a schedule...
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Gasquet Tries to Sue to "Clear His Name"
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
An Interesting Experiment
One blurb from the story highlights the reason I started this blog in the first place:
"As for the larger issue of drugs in sports, eight months in the world of the artificially enhanced convinced me more than ever that it's critical for an organization like the World Anti-Doping Agency to succeed. This group, founded after the Salt Lake Olympics by Canadian anti-doping leader Dick Pound, represents the most serious international attempt to come to grips with sports doping. WADA is the logical response to an argument that gets aired from time to time: that since cheating is impossible to eliminate, the only recourse is to simply legalize everything—that way, no athlete has a hidden advantage over another, since everyone would be free to try anything that might increase endurance.
Like a lot of powerfully bad ideas, that one has a certain mad logic. But it would turn every sport into a test of how much damage an athlete was willing to risk to improve performance, and would basically force every serious athlete to cheat and risk his or her health. Athletic contests would have a strange life-or-death quality. If we don't keep drugs out of these events, they become freak shows, the athletes like gladiators—with us playing the role of decadent Romans, urging them on."
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Henin Back...
Monday, September 21, 2009
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Rafa's amazing workout routine
This is one of the most uninspired workouts I've seen (thanks Anonymous). It reminds me of guys who show up at the gym in January for their one workout after their New Year's resolution. That is not a muscle building workout and, frankly, he looked like he was doing many of those exercise routines for the first time, anyway. Can someone who speaks better Spanish than I do translate what Rafa says at the end there?
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Off Season...
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Word Spreads
Monday, September 14, 2009
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Rafa Slimmed Down?
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Losin' Ugly
Thursday, September 10, 2009
New York Times has piece on doping in tennis
Here's one excerpt:
David Howman, the director general of WADA, praised tennis’s program, although he said the federation could test more often for EPO, a blood-boosting drug that is said to increase endurance. “Tennis conducts a very good antidoping program,” he said.
Update: I want to thank all the contributors to this site, named and unnamed for their help in making this site a bit more credible and respectable. I think it's fair to say that this is the first place to stop for anyone curious about the subject of steroids and other performance enhancing drugs in the sport of tennis. This, of course, will always be a just a blog, but it looks like it is helping to get the subject out in the open (no pun intended).
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Can't Resist
Anyone that doubts that Nadal will be pumped and ready for the U.S. Open as if he was never really injured, isn't with the program. Pay attention!
It's actually been fun watching the tennis without having to focus on the steroid issue. I find myself cheering for a lot of the players that I most suspect. Hopefully, I can stay objective.
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Time for a Break
Role Model...
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Friday, August 28, 2009
Say it ain't so...
Thursday, August 27, 2009
New Training Methods and Nutrition?
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Murray whines about drug testing
And Nadal puts in his usual two cents:
Spain's Rafael Nadal has also had plenty to say on the subject.
He said: "I think it shows a lack of respect for privacy. I think it’s a disgrace. These are things that completely have to change, and there is a unanimous voice on that in the locker room. It is an intolerable hunt."
By the way, is it truly a "unanimous voice" on that? Last I heard, some players were in favor.
Update: I was stewing about this article even more while taking my dogs for a walk. What self-entitled little punks these guys are. They are making tens of millions of dollars and complaining about having to get up at 7:15 one day? Well, join the rest of the world Andy and Rafa. And you think it's unfair that there is more scrutiny on you than "journeymen" players? Gee, let me break out my violin. All of this whining and we find out that they were tested twice over the course of a year out of competition (and allowed to refuse two or three tests without penalty). Go get a real job if this is so "intolerable." I guarantee you will crawl on broken glass to get your tennis gig back after two weeks of working at a Wal-Mart for minimum wage.
Update 2: As a couple of commenters have pointed out, Murray presumably chose 7:15 as the most convenient time to be tested, so it's even more insincere for him to whine about it. Make it 9:00 AM if you don't want it to interfere with your beauty sleep.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Off topic
This is the Becher's Bay anchorage on Santa Rosa Island in the Channel Islands off the coast of California. I wish that was our boat.
A couple of dolphins broke off from a pack of about 25 to play along the side of our boat.
Minar tests positive
Pseudoephedrine could certainly help performance, but it is surprising that players would take this, since it is basically a game-time drug and if they are drug tested afterwards, they are screwed. Kuznetsova also got caught with this in her system, but they let it go because her match was an exhibition match and she blamed it on a cold.
Update: Someone posted an interview with the ATP CEO after the Kuznetsova incident in '05. Note how quickly the CEO comes to the defense of Kuznetsova and vilifies the Belgian official who released the information. It would appear that they weren't expecting the Belgians to do drug testing for a charity event and they were quite angry at them.
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Saturday, August 22, 2009
A Bolt of Denial

I know this is not a tennis story, per se, but it is probably a steroid story. It seems people want to believe that a rather muscular sprinter on a team full of rather muscular sprinters who represent a country that is inexplicably dominating men's and women's sprints and who have recently had a doping scandal amongst some of its sprinters, is somehow clean and running an inexplicable 9.58 in the 100 Meters. Television sportscasters are ignoring the obvious and building this guy up just as they did Marion Jones and the baseball sluggers and a host of other athletes. It should be obvious to even the most ignorant sports journalists (is that redundant?) that something is very fishy about this. It is very hard for me to understand how they can simply bury their heads in the sand. These people have millions to spend reporting sports. Put some of that money into an actual investigation and expose this.
Eventually, he is going to be caught. When it happens, watch these same sports journalists (along with fans) turn on this guy that they have built up as some kind of Superman.
Friday, August 21, 2009
Add Kleybanova to an unusual trend...

Clijsters, Bartoli, Kanepi, Groenefeld (Am I forgetting any?). More power to this selection of larger women who are somehow competing at the top levels of tennis, but it certainly seems odd to me and doesn't fit my understanding of what it takes to be a top tennis professional. It would seem that this kind of size would be too much of a hindrance in terms of stamina and speed to be overcome by a little extra power. Do I suspect PED's? Yes. Am I open to alternate explanations? Fire away...
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Facetious Argument Alert
Goldfish Might not Remember
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
The ESPN Piece on the Decline of Tennis in America
Obviously, racquet technology has contributed to this, but (you knew this was coming) I think that steroids have as well. Also, to my naked eye, not as many American players seem juiced up. If that is the case, I don't know the reason for that. It seems like there is an endless supply of somewhat ubiquitous Eastern European players coming into the game, with just a little more muscle than you might expect. Perhaps it is easier to get away with testing in other countries or perhaps it is more accepted as a necessary part of the game there, or perhaps I am mistaken and there are just better weight training programs there (although I find that unlikely). Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of American players who I suspect of steroid use, but I'm wondering if overall there is less of a culture of steroid use available to players here - at least in tennis...
If that is accurate and there is no way to stop the use of steroids then, sadly, the only way that more Americans will be able to compete at a higher level is to use more 'roids.
Inch by inch
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Monday, August 17, 2009
Links
Sunday, August 16, 2009
Chocolate and Cola...
When she got back on the court, she felt slow and stiff. She faded out of the top group. She was distracted when her mother, Snezana, became ill and needed surgery. The rock-bottom moment came at Wimbledon, where 17-year-old qualifier Melanie Oudin upset her in the third round.
She took a month off to help her mother get through surgery and overhaul her approach to tennis. She cut chocolate and cola from her diet. She went back to playing her style from '08."
These stories... Are we to believe that she put on 15 pounds of muscle naturally, then lost it, but is still muscular?

Saturday, August 15, 2009
Phase Zero

Here's an old pic of Chris Evert, a Phase Zero from the old days. Now, of course, there is more weightlifting these days for players and you could raise the threshold for a Phase Zero a bit.

More importantly, though, I should point out that Phase Zero doesn't disprove steroids. Two players who tested positive for steroids were still definitely in the Phase Zero Camp. Sesil Karatantcheva and Petr Korda. I think this goes along with the fact that it seems to take awhile before steroid use shows, especially if the player isn't doing much weightlifting. Had they gotten away with it for a few years, I imagine that both these players would have moved up a phase or two. But it also shows that you can't always tell a book by its cover.

Tennis Balls
I admit to a great deal of ignorance about this issue (and so many others, as a few commenters like to remind me). Generally, anything that breaks up the "consistency" could make things more interesting, as I see it. I'm wondering also whether a particular ball brand or design might be advantageous for a power player and whether a different type of ball could slow things down and give less of an advantage for the, shall we say, "pumped up" players.
Great News...
Can someone please direct me to Nadal's doctor?
Friday, August 14, 2009
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Call 'em as I see 'em
Retracting my Retraction
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
What is he on?

While this unretouched photo doesn't accentuate the physique of Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (borderline Phase II), I have to ask what the heck happened to his left arm? A partially invisible arm isn't going to help a tennis player too much, but if he is able to make himself entirely invisible, he will have a very unfair advantage over the other players (unless they also make themselves invisible, which would make for an interesting game of tennis).
Update: A reader notes the shadow still showing his left arm. Spooky...
The New Four Phase Rating System
Phase I: The player seems to have a bit more muscle than you might expect from a tennis player. This could be from steroid use, but it could easily be explained by some extra time in the weight room or good genetics.
Phase II: The player seems unusually muscular and steroids are beginning to be a likely explanation. It still might be a case of hitting the gym hard or good genetics, but I am definitely leaning towards steroid use.
Phase III: The player looks like they are probably using steroids. It's not inconceivable that they have developed their physique through natural methods and genetics, but it just seems very unlikely.
Phase IV: The player's physique would be very difficult if not impossible to explain by anything other than steroids. Only a diehard fan or a sportswriter with a complete lack of integrity, a total sellout, would claim that this player was clean.
I hope this is helpful. I'll try to put a few examples up to delineate between the phases.
Here's a couple of Phase I female players:


(Actually, more recent pictures of Errani are putting her near the Phase II level)
Phase I is trickier for male players, because some men are fairly muscular to begin with. Here a couple in my opinion:


I'd say that Igor is pushing into Phase II territory.
Phase II Women


Phase II Men


Phase III Women:


I'd also put Jelena Jankovic in the Phase III category, although I think she was actually pushing Phase IV for awhile and trimmed down.
Phase III Men:
I'm finding this a to be a tough category. I'll just put this guy in although he is more of a II - III tweener:

The Phase IV players need little introduction for anyone who reads this blog. Currently, I put Nadal and Monfils in the Phase IV category for men and Serena, Sam Stosur, Safina and Dementieva for women.
Dementieva to Start my Evening
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
A fair point...

A reader sends me a picture of his own arm to make the point that his veins are quite prominent and he is not on steroids. I think that is a valid point. Some people do tend show more vein or have more definition than others. And often, the arguments made to refute that someone is on 'roids are along the lines of "I've seen someone like that - it's not unusual." The problem is that too many players seem to be "anomalies." There are too many "naturally" muscular or vein-enhanced or bulked up players to be believed. Beyond that, some of the women are past even the anomaly category. There just aren't women who look like that without steroids. Again, if you just had one player like that, you might let it go, but their numbers seem to be on the rise. Taken as whole, I think we are past the point where you could argue against against a steroid problem in tennis, but of course it is tricky when you focus on any one player to the exclusion of the rest.
Monday, August 10, 2009
And these are just the losers
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Losing Late In the Year Nothing New For Nadal
Something that has always seemed suspicious to me is that Nadal always goes on a tear in the spring and early summer, but by August, he always seems pretty ordinary. Maybe that's when he stops
Consider his post-Wimbledon record from 2006 Present:
2006:
Masters Canada: lost on 3rd round to Berdych
Cincinatti Masters: lost in quarters to Ferrero
US Open: lost in quarters to Youzhny
Stockholm: lost in 2nd round to J. Johansson
Madrid Masters lost in quarters to Berdych
Masters Cup: lost in round robin to Blake
Masters Cup: lost in semis to Federer
2007:
Stuttgart (July) won
Canadian Masters: lost in semis to Djokovic
Cincinatti Masters: lost in 2nd round to Monaco
US Open: lost in 4th round to Ferrer
Masters Madrid: lost in quarters to Nalbandian
Paris Masters: lost in final to Nalbandian
Masters Cup: lost in round robin to Ferrer
Masters Cup: lost in semis to Federer
2008:
Canadian Masters (late July) won
Cincinatti Masters lost in semis to Djokovic
Olympics: (mid August) won
US Open: lost in semis to Murray
Masters Madrid: lost in semis to Simon
Paris Masters: lost in semis to Davydenko
Masters Cup: did not play (injury)
One More For the Road
Another Young Athlete Dies Suddenly
I think it's worth noting this so soon after Montcourt's death. It is not unheard of for professional athletes to die suddenly, but one would expect some explanation. Again, it's hard to evaluate when they use laymen's terms for the cause of death. While there are relationships between - "heart attack," "heart failure", and "cardiac arrest," they are actually 3 distinct terms. In both of these cases I would imagine the actual cause of death would be cardiac arrest (the heart stops beating properly and doesn't pump blood to the body).
There have been some cases related to cocaine use (like the great college basketball player Len Bias) and to a congenital defect of the heart (like "Pistol" Pete Maravich), but Montcourt's drug screen was reportedly negative and no report of a heart defect was noted to my knowledge. There are also some defects in heart conduction that can lead to a cardiac arrest, but I would expect those to be noted on an EKG and I would assume that athletes of this caliber have had EKG's at some point.
Where I'm going with this is that I hope that an investigation and a screen for other substances that might not be picked up in a regular drug screen are performed. It may be that this is just a coincidence, but I think it should be ruled out whether there are some potentially dangerous PED's out there.
Sharapova Getting Stronger?
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Friday, August 7, 2009
Roddick Recovers from Injury and Looks Strong...
Tough break for Zheng Jie
Thursday, August 6, 2009
(Very) Cheesy 80's Video Makes a Point...
This was the World Champion female bodybuilder before steroids came on the scene. I recall her going on talk shows and people being shocked at how muscular she was. How many of the top female tennis players put her to shame? Is there something in the water?
(Bonus appearance by Arnold)
An Open Note to NBA Commissioner David Stern
Clean up the NBA, because it has a huge steroid problem and as soon as I've fully exposed the tennis steroid problem, I'm coming after you. You have been warned.
Love,
THASP (or BHASP)
Nadal Peek

Nadal is back on the horizon. You can't see too much with his new sleeved shirts (This look is really thwarting my efforts to get good pics of the men players, if it keeps up, I'm going to take it personally). From what I can see, he looks as pumped as usual. If I had to create an alternate explanation for his recent absence (meaning something other than the dubious tendinitis claim), I'd say that he probably had to lay off the supplements for awhile, because he skipped an out-of-competition test or two (you are only allowed 3 in 18 months I believe, and God knows he has been complaining about them this year), played the French as the supplements were were losing their effect and now is back and ready with new vitamin supplements on board. That is, of course, just my opinion. I have no proof one way or another. It is just conjecture on my part. I should be ashamed of myself for even suggesting it. Good luck, Rafa!
ITF Appeals Doping Ruling on Gasquet
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Strong Start
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
A Lot of Almosts...
Monday, August 3, 2009
Nadal in for Montreal
"Rafa will play in Montreal. It is good news for us," Toni Nadal told Radio Marca.
"It's another thing to know what standard he will be at. I imagine he won't be in very good condition. He has been training but without really pushing it very much. To see what form he's in we'll have to see how he copes in a proper match," he said.
On another note, steroids or not, the whole "Uncle Toni" svengali thing is a little weird.
Sunday, August 2, 2009
Puzzle
Saturday, August 1, 2009
Montcourt Down the Memory Hole
From a Player's mouth in 2003
Ilie, who was knocked out of the Australian Open on Tuesday, said the problem of drug-taking in the sport had reached dangerous levels.
He said he had never used or been offered performance-enhancing drugs, but others felt the pressure to perform.
"The problem is so bad that you might as well just let them use it and when players see people dying on court and exploding, then it's going to change their minds," Ilie told the Herald Sun newspaper.
"The sport has become so competitive and powerful it is just a matter of fitness and who will outlast who out there," he said.
"People are just happy to sacrifice their health for three years of fame."
Friday, July 31, 2009
How did she do it?
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Conte Speaks
Many drug-tested athletes use what I call the "duck and dodge" technique. Several journalists in the UK have recently referred to it as the "duck and dive" technique. This is basically how it works.
First, the athlete repeatedly calls their own cell phone until the message capacity is full. This way the athlete can claim to the testers that they didn't get a message when they finally decide to make themselves available. Secondly, they provide incorrect information on their whereabouts form. They say they are going to one place and then go to another. Thereafter, they start using testosterone, growth hormone and other drugs for a short cycle of two to three weeks.
After the athlete discontinues using the drugs for a few days and they know that they will test clean, they become available and resume training at their regular facility (THASP Note- At least until last year, tennis players could miss 3 tests in 18 months).
Most athletes are tested approximately two times each year on a random out-of -competition basis. If a tester shows up and the athlete is not where they are supposed to be, then the athlete will receive a "missed test". This is the equivalent to receiving "strike one" when up to bat in a baseball game. The current anti-doping rules allow an athlete to have two missed tests in any given eighteen-month period without a penalty or consequence. So, the disadvantage for an athlete having a missed test is that they have one strike against them. The advantage of that missed test is the athlete has now received the benefit of a cycle of steroids. Long story short, an athlete can continue to duck and dive until they have two missed tests, which basically means that they can continue to use drugs until that time.
In summary, it's my opinion that more than fifty percent of the drug tests performed each year should be during the off season or the fourth quarter. This is when the track athletes are duckin' and divin' and using anabolic steroids and other drugs. Let me provide some rather startling information for your consideration. If you check the testing statistics on the USADA website, you will find that the number of out-of-competition drug tests performed during each quarter of 2007 are as follows: in the first quarter there were 1208, second quarter 1295, third quarter 1141 and in the fourth quarter there were only 642.
In late 2003 I advised USADA about the importance of random testing during the fourth quarter of the year. They did initially seem to follow my advice because they increased the number of fourth-quarter tests in 2004, 2005 and 2006.
However, they failed to continue this practice in 2007. Why would USADA decide to perform only 15% of their annual out-of-competition tests during the fourth quarter? Let's not forget that this is the off season before the upcoming summer Olympic Games. This is equivalent to a fisherman knowing that the fish are ready to bite and then consciously deciding that it is time to reel in his line and hook, lean his fishing pole up against a tree and take a nap.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Paszek's Treatment
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Well, I'm not above rumors...

A few people have sent me photographs of Rafael Nadal lately, purporting to show that he is losing his pumped-up physique and doing things like golfing, jumping off a boat and possibly playing soccer. The double suggestion is that he's off steroids, and is exaggerating his injury. This would be consistent with rumors that he had a positive drug test and has been laying off the juice, while negotiating with tennis officials. While I'm always hoping for a smoking gun, I have some doubts about these rumors. None of the pics really get a good angle on his physique and they mostly show his right, less impressive arm, so I think the jury is still out on his current level of pumpitude.
Also, I know he is a marquee player, but I find it hard to believe that they could keep a positive drug test a secret for that long while hanging Gasquet and Paszek out to dry. If, in fact, he was juicing and now stopped juicing, I can’t imagine that he would then enter a Slam. That would be like Marion Jones’ comeback attempt – futile. Stranger things have happened and we’ll find out soon enough, but I say he either comes to the U.S. Open looking very pumped up or he doesn’t compete at all.
Nothing?
Some Stories Seem to Just Disappear
Monday, July 27, 2009
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Jamaica's Training Methods Revealed

It was just a matter of time before this obfuscation (to borrow a word from Peter Bodo) started to unravel. And, contrary to the article's claim, I think that 2 members of the 400 meter relay team should be considered "top sprinters." Anyone still believe that Bolt is clean?:
Herb Elliott of the Jamaica Anti-Doping Commission told Radio Jamaica that four men and one woman have been informed of the results and will have an opportunity to contest them at a hearing. They tested positive at last month's national championships and all of them were chosen for the 46-member team representing Jamaica at next month's world championships in Berlin, Elliott said.The Jamaica Observer, citing unidentified sources, first reported the positive tests and said they did not include any of the top sprinters. The newspaper reported there were two members of the men's 400-meter relay team, two on the men's 1,600-meter relay and a female runner in the 1,600 relay.
More of Bodo's Greatest Hit Pieces (Back when hit pieces were cool)
I hate to be the heavy here, but does it occur to anyone else that Puerta and his crew simply knew--or figured out--that they had a pretty good fallback position on a potential doping charge if they got Mariano’s wife on some form of medication that could then be blamed for a potential positive result? It seems to me that dopers are using a different kind of masking agent now--a public relations and spin-based one."
That Point of Frustration...
When I set up this blog, I really thought that showing pictures of many of the unnaturally muscular, top players, would be an "Emperor has no clothes" moment. That certainly was not the case. I underestimated the level of denial of many tennis fans. Well, tennis fans are one thing, but the journalists who cover the sport are another matter entirely. First, you have the former players, who must know better than anyone that this problem has existed for years. Then you have sportswriters like Peter Bodo, who deny the problem and then compare performance enhancing drugs to good nutrition. Any excuse is accepted as plausible: "They must have put steroids in my sports supplement," "I was using that stimulant for my asthma," "I needed my blood enriched for my back problem," "I kissed a contaminated girl on the lips."
Tennis players whine about "invasive" drug testing and the sportswriters nod in agreement. Tennis players pull out of tournaments with phantom injuries, then are magically healed for the next tournament and no one questions this behavior. Drug testing is said to be stringent, then we find out it is filled with loopholes.
I have to ask if there will ever be an "Emperor has no clothes" moment? It has happened in track and baseball and cycling, so it seems inevitable, but I wonder whether tennis will be different. Maybe fans have just grown tired of these drug scandals and no longer want to hear about it. Maybe there is a certain elitism about tennis that shields it from the kind of investigation needed to expose the scandal. Maybe it's just all the money. I don't really know, but I am frustrated. Peter Bodo's piece is a proverbial "line in the sand" from the powers that be in the tennis world. They just aren't going to go there unless they are dragged kicking and screaming. I suppose that's what I'm going to try and do, but I wish it didn't have to be that way.
Friday, July 24, 2009
Tamira Paszek
Update: The story isn't even mentioned on the ESPN or Sport Illustrated websites.
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Dueling Pete Bodos
Alternate title 2: What happened to Peter's Principles?
Now, Mr. Bodo, I believe you have some 'splainin' to do...:
Peter 2006
First of all, at this site I am a blogger—an opinion journalist and commentator. I have neither the mandate nor the responsibility to deal strictly and exclusively with facts and/or the thoughts or opinions of others about those facts.
Peter 2009
including that recent Slate piece, which was the usual hit job filled with nothing more than innuendo and the author's prejudiced speculations
Peter 2006
But what are you going to do? Allow doping? Talk the talk, but look the other way as soon as there’s even a hint of a problem (as I believe the ATP and WTA have done for years)?
Peter 2009
… I've seen nothing to refute the claim that tennis is by and large clean, and well-policed
Peter 2006
Trust me: Doping is a burning, omnipresent topic on the pro tour these days. I owe it to you to tackle it, and I am proud that as a blogger I can do that in a way that a newspaper reporter cannot.__
Peter 2009
…that recent Slate piece, which was the usual hit job filled with nothing more than innuendo and the author's prejudiced speculations
Peter 2006
It's a different landscape now. You can read why and how this came about at this page of the ITF’s anti-doping website. __Is it mere coincidence that we’ve had a sudden explosion of positive tests? Why have the increasingly puzzling scheduling habits of so many players suddenly become front-burner issues? Draw back and look at this in perspective; it seems to me that we’re in the midst of an undeclared, unannounced shake-up.
Peter 2009
You have to wonder where all this will end, but perhaps more to the point, where it all comes from - lax regulations or over-enthusiastic efforts to ensure that the sport is clean? __I'm still in the latter camp, and I've seen nothing to refute the claim that tennis is by and large clean, and well-policed
Peter 2006
Given the amount of time he’s had off and the fact that Nadal’s own doctor said in an official ATP press release that his foot is healed, I find his withdrawal from an event that will be without the defending champ, Safin, or Agassi, baffling.__Whether or not there's anything more to this story, I can't say. But I'm going to make a point in Australia to pin down some folks on some of the more compelling issues—like whether or not it's possible to duck out-of-competition testing by simply not answering the door when the testers come around.
Peter 2009
The funny thing about doping is that it really invites the most outrageous and circumstantial speculations. A guy - or girl - whips himself into fantastic shape and the first thing a certain element of the public claims is that the player must be doping. There's a lot wrong with that kind of thinking, starting with the fact that it's profoundly insulting.
I'm calling out Peter Bodo (again)
One of the big reasons that the steroid problem has gotten out of hand in tennis is because "journalists" like Peter Bodo have turned a blind eye to it. I suppose they know where their bread is buttered:
" tennis is by and large clean and well-policed..."
Right, Peter...
And here is Peter Bodo saying the opposite of what he is saying now. One wonders what made him change his mind? To be continued...
Update: Bodo Logic (courtesty of Susan): Don't people who eat have an unfair advantage over those who don't eat? And what about if someone drinks water and it helps them play better? Should we ban food and water?
What if someone doesn't smoke? Arent't they at an advantage also? All players should have to smoke or it's cheating.
Milestone
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Interesting Comment From Slate Article
Drugs may be a factor in the degradation of style and technique in tennis over recent decades. For a hundred years, Western grips and two-handed backhands were considered highly unorthodox and even incorrect technique, in part because they required more running (less lateral reach), required more squatting to pick up the low balls, and required more energy to heave the rackets sharply upward to lift the ball over the net. (The advantage is that they facilitate greater topspin.)
But nowadays Western grips and two-handed backhands have become standard. It may be that drug-induced fitness is enabling players to enjoy the advantages of these hitting styles without paying the penalty of early exhaustion. Their success belittles the authority of generations of authors of tennis how-to books, and reduces young players' respect for (the ability of) their elders.
Update: A commenter chalks this change up simply to the change in racquets over the years. I'm definitely not an expert on this subject. I was more interested in the "degradation of style and technique" aspect of the comment. To my eyes, the more powerful game being played now shows less style and technique (and a lot more grunting). You could argue that it is simply a matter of a DIFFERENT style and technique, but it just seems like something has been lost and not just because of the improvement in racquets over the years. It would also be interesting to ponder the reverse; whether the change in racquet makes steroids more advantageous for players.
Legalizing Performance Enhancing Drugs?
1. Have we really tried all that hard to stop the use of performance enhancing drugs?
The history of most professional sports has been a lax attitude about drug testing. This may, in part, be a bit of naivete on the part of the officials of these sports, but I think it has generally been deliberate. Athletes on steroids and other performance enhancing drugs are bigger, faster and break records. It adds excitement to the game and that adds money to the pockets of the same people who are supposed to guard the hen house. If we are going to stop, or at least control the use of performance enhancing drugs, a real effort needs to be made. When, for example, the tennis steroid scandal eventually comes to light, many players are going to disappear and tennis will be starting fresh. Like baseball, it will initially hurt the game financially, but finally we will get a chance to see only clean athletes play the game. Is it inevitable that a new crop of players will find ways to beat the system and use performance enhancing drugs - proving Dr. Yesalis' point? I don't know, but I think it's worth finding out.
2. What will happen if performance enhancing drugs are made legal?
While the current crop of drugs already leave some players looking a bit freakish, imagine what it might be like in ten, twenty or even thirty years, particularly as children are fed these drugs to create the ultimate athlete. Will we have a 450 linebacker coming after a 7 and a half foot tall quarterback? Will someone Yao Ming’s size be a point guard? Will we have a tennis player who is so tall and strong that he has a 200 mph serve? I admit that it sounds exciting in a gladiatorial kind of way, but these athletes will become somewhat of a carnival sideshow. I’m guessing sports like curling, bowling, darts and such would take on a new popularity for those of us who want athletes that at least seem like they are in the same species as us (I’m waiting for the first person to send me a link about performance enhancing drugs in bowling – other than beer…).
3. The drugs won't just be optional - you won't be able to compete without them
This is already true in such sports as bodybuilding and would certainly be true for any kind of weightlifting, wrestling or other strength sports. Arguably (at least I make this argument), it may be close to true in tennis right now. Clearly, allowing performance enhancing drugs is going to be equivalent to requiring them.
4. These drugs are not healthy for people
There are already enough problems with the drugs out there today. The drugs of the future will likely be even more dangerous.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
The Rumor Mill Swirls
Steroids and Muscle Building Part II


Rafael Nadal's admission that he doesn't spend much time in the gym was somewhat surprising to me. I didn't think that he could gain that kind of muscle development from weightlifting alone, and now it appears he isn't even weightlifting. Some readers have been asking me to what extent a player can gain muscle without weight training. I come from a gym background and I hadn't really considered this possibility. I just assumed that players were doing at least some weight training and my assumption was reinforced by those arguing that players are more muscular due to all the weight training they are doing. In the past, sports like tennis and swimming have not created particularly muscular athletes. Both require mostly what we would term "aerobic" exercise and aren't known to bulk up muscle. This leaves me wondering how a tennis player might build that kind of muscle without weightlifting. Are players building this muscle from playing tennis? I actually think they are (with the help of some "supplements").
To make my point I want to start with swimming. There have been two steroid scandals in world class swimming. The first was the East German women of the 1970's and the second was the Chinese women in the 1990's. If you look at pictures of these athletes (and I'm assuming no one doubts they were on steroids), you see impressive upper body definition, but, surprisingly, relatively "normal" lower body size and definition. I believe the reason for that is the nature of the sport. Although kicking is important in swimming, it doesn't compare to the work you do with the upper body. After a long race, your shoulders, arms and chest are likely to be exhausted, but generally your legs remain relatively fresh. Apparently, with steroids on board, that upper body work is enough to build muscle, but the legs still don't really cross that threshold. This seems to show that you can build muscle on steroids with much more aerobic exercise than you could without steroids.
If you look at the, uh, more muscular tennis players, however, they also have very muscular legs. They are running and stopping and putting a lot of stress on the leg muscles as well as the upper body with their swing. This puts their lower body over that threshold, I think. Interestingly, in Nadal's case there is marked asymmetry between his dominant left hand and his right hand, particularly the two biceps. I think this is a similar point. He puts much more work on his left arm while playing and it develops much more. If he worked out and did a lot of curls and other exercises for his arms, this asymmetry would even out. I see a little bit of asymmetry in some of the other more muscular players, but not to the extent of Nadal. Either they do more weight training than he does to balance it out, or they use their non-dominant arm more than he does (anyone want to chime in on that subject?). In any case, racquets today are lighter than they were 30 or 40 years ago. There is really no reason why Arthur Ashe and John McEnroe and Chris Evert would not have been at least as muscular as players today if modern players aren't really doing much weight training.
Interesting Article About Players Getting Off Easy From Doping
Monday, July 20, 2009
Any news on Montcourt?
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Nadal Mocks His Defenders
For those who have been claiming the Nadal has gained his muscular, high-definition frame from weight training. Rafael Nadal mocks you just as he mocks the rest of us. As I see it, in this article he is basically saying, "Ha ha, you'll never catch me and I'll keep collecting my paychecks."
Well, here's what he really says:
"I hate the gym.
I don’t spend much time in there and I never have done – I just don’t see why. I only ever run when there’s some point to it – say, if it’s in a game of tennis. I do a lot of aerobics in the pre-season period, but after that I keep fit by playing in tournaments."
"I’ve decided to put my muscles away.
I used to wear sleeveless T-shirts all the time on court, but now I’ve got a brand new look – I’ve moved on to polo shirts. Sleeveless T-shirts give you real freedom of movement and they keep you cooler in matches, but I just thought it was time for a change."
I Don't Understand Modern Training Techniques

I get a lot of people saying something like this: "The reason players have good muscle and definition is because modern players do a lot of weight training and cardiovascular training." So can someone explain how women players like Groenefeld (above) and Bartoli are competing at top levels, while carrying around that much size? Shouldn't they be too slow, lumbering and lacking in late game stamina to compete?
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Friday, July 17, 2009
One last post on Gasquet (A partial apology)
It's a desert out there for good pics
The Larger Point Regarding the Gasquet Fiasco
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Fascinating Sports Illustrated Article about Drugs in Sports
An Alternative Version of the Gasquet Affair

An alternative story (to this fairy tale offered by Gasquet). I'll let the reader decide which is more plausible:
Gasquet had hurt his shoulder and knew he was withdrawing from the Miami tournament, so, far from being the shy guy he was painted as at his hearing, decided to go out and party after he had run into a French DJ that afternoon, who told him about an event he was DJ’ing that is apparently known as a big coke party. Richard called his mommy and had her get a ticket for him back to France, but not until the next day, so he could go to the event that night and party. Gasquet went to the event and imbibed the same substances as everyone else.
Thinking that he would not be subject to an in-competition drug test, since he hadn’t played any matches, he got caught up, because he technically was entered in the competition (he hadn’t played because he had a bye, but the first round had already started) and was therefore subject to an in-competition drug test and his number came up. So he had to do the drug test.
He spent a lot of time in the hearing trying to say that this was really an out-of-competition drug test, probably because different rules and jurisdictions would apply and he apparently might be able to weasel out of it on a technicality. That argument failed, but he had the backup argument that he had kissed “Pamela” on the mouth (several times) and this somehow got enough cocaine in his system to give him a positive test. Even though she denied EVER kissing him on the lips, she wouldn’t come to the hearing where she was to be painted as a coke whore, so her denial was ignored.
Where did he come up with this implausible story in the first place? Was it his doctor or coach? No, it was apparent cocaine expert, Rafael Nadal, who suggested this as a hypothetical way to have such a thing happen.
"Nadal fears that even casual contact with a drug user could have easily accounted for the positive test of the number 21. "He's most certainly not taking cocaine," said Nadal. "You know what the world is like today. When you go to a party, anything can happen these days. If you kiss a girl who's taken cocaine, anything can happen, and that's the truth."
You want the truth, Nadal? You can’t handle the truth.
Gasquet was then blessed with a Confederacy of Dunces who believed or chose to believe this absurd premise. For the record, let's name them here:
Tim Kerr QC, Chairman
Professor Richard H. McLaren
Dr. Mario ZorzolI
The ITF"s New Mission
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Is Gasquet's wrist still hurting?
THASP Interview With Dr. Charles Yesalis
Charles Yesalis is a Professor of Health Policy and Administration, Exercise and Sport Science at Penn State University.
From his bio:
For the past twenty-five years, much of Dr. Yesalis' research has been devoted to the non-medical use of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AS) and other performance-enhancing drugs and dietary supplements. In 1988 he directed the first national study of AS use among adolescents and was the first to present evidence of psychological dependence on AS. In addition, he has studied the incidence of AS use among elite power lifters, collegiate athletes, and professional football players. In 1993, using nationwide data, he demonstrated the association between AS use and violent behavior as well as an association with the use of other illicit drugs and alcohol. He also presented an estimate of lifetime AS use in the U.S. population (over one million). A recent study conducted by Dr. Yesalis showed a significant increase in AS use among teenage girls and boys since 1990.
I conducted this interview by phone and did not have access to a tape recorder, so I am reconstructing the interview through my notes and memory (I’ll send a copy to Dr. Yesalis in case he has corrections or clarifications). I will occasionally add commentary in parentheses. Dr. Yesalis shoots from the hip and I think readers will enjoy his style:
THASP: Do you think that there is a steroid problem in tennis?
CY: Look – There’s a lot of money in tennis, like many professional sports. It’s human nature that people will try to get an edge in business, war and sports.
THASP: Looking at today’s players in comparison to players of years past, do you think that their muscularity, stamina and athleticism is indicative of steroid or performance enhancing drug use?
CY: I suppose you could explain some of it by nutrition and working out, but adding 10 – 15 pounds of muscle, all things equal, is going to give you an advantage. If a player is ranked 180th, he probably isn’t going to jump to the top, but among top players you’ll get an advantage. (Stated later in the interview) Steroids and Growth Hormone can improve performance and allow athletes to practice more and recuperate faster.
THASP: Do you think that the current drug testing is adequate?
CY: There’s Growth Hormone, designer steroids… Top players would have enough money to get what they want.
THASP: Are you referring to tennis, specifically?
CY: It’s ubiquitous in all sports. You can only test for what you know exists. By the time we find out about one drug, they have moved on to another. There is a lot of money involved and it’s not all that difficult. Victor Conte and Patrick Arnold weren’t exactly brain surgeons. It’s not that hard to get around testing if you want.
THASP: Do you think that the WADA “whereabouts” out-of-competion testing can be effective?
CY: Look, there are as many elite athletes using today as there were 10, 20 or even 30 years ago. I’m hearing they can even get around the “passport system.” I’ve been doing this for 30 years. At first I was naively optimistic, but no real progress has been made.
THASP: Some players are complaining that the whereabouts system is an invasion of privacy.
CY: I think they have a good point! I think it’s beyond the pale. That’s my patriotic view.
THASP: Many of us are drug tested at our workplace. I’m subject to random searches. How is this any different?
CY: Do they do body cavity searches on you?
THASP: No.
CY: I mean, there are levels, right?
(As anyone who reads my site knows, I disagree with his point, here, and I think random searches are a necessary evil. I’d chalk this up to a bit of a political divide. In his bio, Dr. Yesalis notes that he is into weightlifting, Harleys and, when I first contacted him, I had to postpone the interview, because he was going out “shooting.” I am also into weightlifting, just sold my Harley, which was mostly a midlife crisis toy and I am downright afraid of guns).
THASP: Do you think that there is any way to stop the use of performance enhancing drugs in sports?
CY: This has been been going on since the 1960’s. Everytime you have a scandal, then they say, “Okay, now we’ve got it fixed.” But the problem just continues. I wrote an op-ed about this for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution in 1996 before the Olympic Games and made this same point. Still nothing has changed.
THASP: You sound fatalistic about it. If you can’t stop athletes from using performance enhancing drugs, then do you think they should just allow their use in competitions.
CY: (After a long pause) Whenever I’m asked that, I’m tempted to say – well the only thing that stops me is the kids and the role model issue, although kids have plenty of bad role models with entertainers and actors, today.
THASP: I’ve noticed some junior players, 14 and 15 year olds, that seem seem unusually muscular and I’m wondering whether steroids are seeping into youth tennis. Are you aware of a problem with younger tennis players or other athletes?
CY: I had a study published in 1988 in JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) about regular high school teenagers using these drugs. It certainly wouldn’t surprise me if young athletes are using them.
THASP: Do you think that if there was less of a financial incentive, there would be less temptation for players to cheat?
CY: Maybe it would make things a little better, but even in “drug free” bodybuilding tournaments they catch cheaters and all they get for winning is a trophy.
THASP: Thank you very much for your time, Dr. Yesalis.
CY: Thank you, I enjoyed it.
Pics on the Site
THASP
Positive tests or am I misreading this document?
According to this chart, tennis had 17 AAF’s and 8 ADRV’s from testing in 2007. I am going to see if I can find out more about this. Does anyone know why I shouldn’t conclude that this shows a lot of positive tests in tennis that were never made public? (Thanks Matthew)
NOTE: The Adverse Analytical Findings (AAF) in this report are not to be confused with adjudicated or sanctioned Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRV). "Adverse Analytical Finding" is defined in the World Anti-Doping Code as "a report from a laboratory or other WADA-approved entity that, consistent with the International Standard for Laboratories and related Technical Documents, identifies in a Sample the presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers (including elevated quantities of endogenous substances) or evidence of the Use of aProhibited Method."
Update from a commenter:
2007 Tennis Anti-Doping Programme
(ITF Testing)
Hingis,Kyu Tae Im,John Paul Fruttero,Laura Pous Tio,Marcel Felder,Marcelo Melo,Franz Stauder(7 names)
http://www.itftennis.com/antidoping/news/decisions.asp
There are other players listed on the page who failed under the WADA Code due to testing by their national orgs.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
WADA on Whereabouts and out-of-competition testing
The concept of out-of-competition is not new. Experience has shown that out-of-competition testing is crucial to the fight against doping, in particular because a number of prohibited substances and methods are detectable only for a limited period of time in an athlete’s body while maintaining a performance-enhancing effect. The only way to perform such testing is by knowing where athletes are, and the only way to make it efficient is to be able to test athletes at times at which cheaters may be most likely to use prohibited substances and methods.
For this reason, out-of-competition testing has taken place for years. The new element introduced by the 2009 Code and the 2009 International Standard for Testing (IST) is the harmonization, requested by WADA’s stakeholders during the revision process, of the various whereabouts requirements applied by different anti-doping organizations. A number of pre-existing regimes involved athletes providing more extensive whereabouts information than is now required by the Code and IST. In fact, the 2009 Code and IST did not increase whereabouts requirements per se; in many cases, they actually reduced the amount of whereabouts information requested and the burden placed on the athlete as relates to whereabouts requirements. What the 2009 Code and Standard did is harmonize whereabouts requirements among Code signatories, i.e. to a broader range of sports.
Nadal Coming Back Just in Time for US Open
Who could have guessed that he would return so quickly? Most people with such severe tendinitis would want to rest their knees and avoid any hard training. According to the story, he is slowly recuperating, so only a superhuman could be expected to hop on the court and compete with just a few weeks preparation. Best of luck, Rafa!
Outrage is a dish best served to others.
This is a (grainy) video from the World Swimming Championships in Rome in 1994. I post it here to highlight the double standard applied to steroid accusations when the athletes are from "bad" countries. My favorite quote (similar to one I am often chastised for here): "I’ve never seen athletes look that good from just hard work and weight training." By the way, take a look at the Chinese Swimmer they cut away to as he is saying that. As with the East Germans, in the past, the swimmers have massive upper body and thin legs.
I remember similar outrage when the East German women swimmers of the 70's appeared, based mostly on their unnatural physiques. Similar outrage was directed at Russian weightlifters based on their size and the amount that they were able to lift. More recently, outrage was directed at the Chinese women gymnasts for their overly youthful appearance. In other words, it is perfectly acceptable to make negative judgments about athletes based on their appearance and performance if they are from a "bad" country, but don't dare say anything about American and European athletes from our "good" countries.
The Business of Tennis
Monday, July 13, 2009
More on Player Whining About Drug Testing
"It is no fun. But to fight cheats I will do it. I am already giving my daily.”
Mahesh Bhupathi, tennis, India
19 February 2009, Indian Express
“I think this system is demanding but necessary to ensure that everybody can be tested
anytime.”
Gilles Simon, tennis, France
18 February 2009, L’Équipe.fr (translation)
"It's a tough system, no doubt. It's a significant change to what we were used to before, so
I think it takes some getting used to it."
"I feel like this is how you're going to catch them, right? You're not going to catch them
ringing them up and saying, 'Look, I would like to test you maybe in two days.' The guy's
cheating and they're smart, right? It's an hour a day. I know it's a pain, but I would like it
to be a clean sport, and that's why I'm OK with it.”
Roger Federer, tennis, Switzerland
1 February 2009, The Associated Press
“It's a little strict, but it's the same for everyone. It's gonna really clean up our sport. There
will be no questions in anyone's head if anyone's cheating.”
Mike Bryan, tennis, USA
26 March 2009, Miami Herald
Not Meeting their Membership Requirements...
Dear tennis roids,
Unfortunately your registration at Talk Tennis did not meet our membership requirements. Therefore your registration was deleted.
Sorry,
Talk Tennis



























































